From time to time people ask about holsters for concealed carry,
open carry, or field carry such as out in the woods or on property. Many of
these folks ask about the use of holsters with retention devices and those
without. Some people prefer a retention device and some people do not. Everyone
has their opinions. For those of you that may be in the process of forming or
revising your opinion, I will present mine.
Concealed Carry: People carry firearms
concealed beneath one or more layers of clothing for protection against
criminal attacks. These firearms are typically out of view and accessible only
after moving aside a layer of clothing. Many people do not feel the need to
have any type of retention device incorporated into their holster. I tend to
agree with that position.
I have carried in several different types
of holsters over the years. I have used an MTAC, Galco Combat Master, Nick
Mathews #1 IWB, Safariland ALS holsters, and several others. For concealed
carry I mainly used the MTAC and Nick Mathews #1. Lately I have been carrying a
Smith & Wesson M&P 40 in a Gould and Goodrich pancake holster equipped
with a thumb snap.
I carried with the MTAC and Nick Mathews
#1 for five years. During those years I only had a handful of instances where
my pistol became slightly dislodged from the holster due to rigorous activity.
I don't mind having a thumb snap. For me it does not slow my draw, or create
much of a problem in regards to concealing the firearm. My opinion- take it or
leave it, doesn't matter to me.
Open Carry: I have only open carried away
from work a few times. Each time I open carried I used a Safariland ALS
holster, or the previously mentioned Gould and Goodrich thumb snap holster. At
work I use a level III Safariland 6360 ALS holster. In my opinion this holster
is really a level II holster as it only has two retention devices to
defeat.
When carrying a firearm in public view I
feel that the use of some form of retention is an absolute necessity. The
chances of having someone attempt to disarm you are low, the threat is still
there. In my opinion, open carry is a method of carry that requires knowledge
and training in hand to hand combat and weapon retention. My opinion- the use
of a retention holster for open carry is a requirement.
Field Carry: Some people may be asking
exactly what the difference between field carry and open carry is. In reality
they are similar. The only major difference being open carry is typically out
and about in public and field carry is out of public and in the woods or the
field. When I go about in the field I prefer a holster with a thumb snap. I do
not think of the thumb snap or retention device and a requirement.
The only reason I chose to have a thumb
snap on my holster is simply to help keep my gun in place. I don't want to risk
falling, or tripping and rolling down a hill and then find myself searching for
my gun because it fell out of my holster. Granted there are no guarantees with
the use of a thumb snap, it just makes me feel all warm and safe. (Kind of like
gun control laws...sarcasm)
There is nothing wrong with using a
holster with no retention out in the field. If you find yourself in a situation
where you may be in public, throwing a light coat on over your gun is normally
not out of the question. My opinion: a retention device is preferable, but not
required.
Most of the decisions about the use of
retention will be specific to the activities and types of holsters used. A
quality, well fit holster will not typically need a retention device. The thumb
snap tends to make me feel more secure when in the field. I only open carry at
work, and for concealed carry I go either way.
If you are trying to decide between the
two, go with a retention device or thumb snap. Working the device into your
draw stroke is rather simple. If you find that you really don't need the device
or thumb snap you now have a holster well suited for rigorous activity like
hiking or hunting if you are interested in those kinds of activities.